Muffin Bottoms [not] Just another WordPress weblog

06/25/2008

Dickey Betts At The Garde Last Night

Filed under: Music and Stuff — admin @ 5:47 am

It’s hard to get your brain around the fact that Dickey Betts’ been playing 10 minute guitar solos since 1968. Harder still to think he did it again last nite and keeps on keepin’ on!

And his band. Wow. 7 of the strongest musicians anywhere.

Ever, ever ever.

Collage From Garde New London 24jun08

With his son as one of two co-leadguitarists sharing the stage, holy crap! Sometimes they trade licks in a circle forever. Inspiring each other over and over and over. And it shows in the audience response, too.

Things started out slow and built up to a roar, which has been his soloing style, songwriting style and concert style since the get go. I lost count but I think the small cozy 800 or so in attendance asked for 2 or 3 encores. And he humbly gave ’em. Lots of Thank You’s and God Bless you’s.

The two kit drummers who usually weave in and out between sounding exactly similar and perfectly  complementary opposite, gave a couple drum solos that were out of this world while the rest of the band took a break. Then after a second “mini-encore” that way, the bass player came out WITH the drummers and simply wailed as a trio more potent than any drum and bass you’ve ever heard before.

Blue Sky, Ramblin Man, they pulled out all the stops. I’ll close just saying their bass player is the best I’ve heard anywhere in about ten years.

Duane and Pedro Performing “Rolling On” at the moboogieVids Youtube site.

http://www.dickeybetts.com

Dickey Betts and Great Southern’s Myspace page: http://www.myspace.com/dickeybettsgreatsouthern

ok, one last link; Dickey Betts Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickey_Betts

06/24/2008

Romney’s Probably Toast

Filed under: News — admin @ 7:31 am

didja hear one of the Big Dig contractors is trying to declare bankruptcy and has over a billion dollars worth of debt they can’t account for?

Boston – http://www.boston.com/news/traffic/bigdig/articles/2008/06/24/accused_big_dig_firm_files_for_ch_11

http://shrinkster.com/znc

Something tells me Mitt Romney’s got some ‘splainin’ to do…

06/22/2008

Listened To Guns N Roses CD. Kind Of Sux0rs.

Filed under: Music and Stuff,News — admin @ 8:11 pm

I listened to the new Guns N Roses CD before the cease and desists flew and shut their hosting websites down.

Um, how do I put this nicely. OK, it doesn’t not suck.

I’d like to say it has its moments but I’m sorry. I’m not feeling it.

I heard that not only did it take 10+ (did someone say 13???) years to make, but that they spent

30 Mil on it. Um. Let’s see did they buy loops or something? Because that can only cost a grand

or two. Recording and mixdown at places like Record Factory / Hit Plant [sic.] are only half a million

each or so. So where did the money go?

OK. I found something positive to say about G&R.

Slash’s hat is cool.

06/21/2008

Attending MythTV Presentation At FudCon Boston

Filed under: Music and Stuff,Tech — admin @ 8:45 am

Boston University 21jun08

Raw Notes is what you get today.

ready?

new libraries loading in because of proprietary issues
with things fedora can’t come with. 🙁

sos, same old story…

proof of concept of a mythTV liveCD never went anywhere
simply because no one had extra time.

http://www.mythdora.com

digital recording, legacy drivers, and wireless is no longer a problem,

so there are MANY new usb devices coming out soon!

FUDcon, lowkey and fun today.

… and the fastest wifi connect I’ve seen anywhere.

Thank you Boston Univ. 🙂

06/20/2008

Happy Summertime!

Filed under: Tech — admin @ 4:43 am

I love when someone at Radio Shack tells me something’s impossible so I go to Goodwill and build it from leftovers and for pennies!

06/18/2008

FACT FOLLOWS FICTION: They Shouldn’t Have Killed Bigger Thomas; We Shouldn’t Have Killed Tookie Williams.

Filed under: Academic — admin @ 6:31 pm

An Analysis of Richard Wright’s Native Son, by Marc Frucht

Stanley Tookie Williams is dead.

Accused of murdering four people and having helped found the Crips streetgang, he was executed by the state of California. He maintained his innocence right up to the moment of his lethal injection at San Quentin prison.

While awaiting trial he became a Nobel Peace Prize nominee, children’s author and a vocal advocate against gang violence. Williams’ fate was sealed Monday afternoon, December 12, 2005 when California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger rejected a final appeal for clemency. The NAACP, ACLU and the Rev. Jesse Jackson all tried to speak on his behalf.

This all sounds like it could have been from a thrilling 1940s novel Richard Wright might write. But it’s all straight out of newspaper front pages in December 2005. Bigger Thomas was executed in Richard Wright’s book Native Son. The parallels are immense. There are far more similarities between these two cases than there are differences, to be sure.

Wright portrays Bigger’s attorney Boris A. Max, as a lawyer for the Labor Defenders and a Communist lawyer, willing to work for free. It’s arguable whether the modern day “labor defenders” ACLU have anything to do with communism really, but the other parallels are rather precise. Ramsey Clark, William Kunstler and others working pro bono for groups like National Lawyers Guild and the ACLU could easily be labeled ghosts of Boris Max. Max is readily labeled a communist because Labor Defenders as well as his personal friend Jan

Erlone are affiliated with communism. Although Max is well versed in Marxist analysis or communist issues in general it should be noted that throughout Wright’s book Max never once says yes, he is a communist. This depiction serves an ideal (and ironic) metaphor of America’s obsession with communism in its domestic and foreign policy in general, as well as a seemingly appropriate foreshadowing of the McCarthy witch trials which began shortly after Native Son was published. The book came out in 1940, and by the end of the ‘40s the McCarthy witch hunt was raging across the nation.

It would be helpful to note where race and class seem quite similar in both Wright’s book and throughout the U.S. in the ‘40s and ‘50s. State’s Attorney Buckley seems equally venomous as a racist and anticommunist, an easy and fairly accurate stereotype of most white Americans in the ‘50s and perhaps in some ways still to this day. It’s brilliant that Wright portrays Buckley as running for reelection throughout Bigger Thomas’ trial. Politics often keeps both racism and anticommunism institutionalized and embedded in every part of American culture.

One theme recurring through each part of Wright’s Native Son is that the American criminal justice system has never shown the equality and colorblindness that fans of its adversarial system at least profess. Court appointed attorneys still fall asleep in the middle of court cases, and statistics have shown that they do that more to people who are black and/or poor than the paid attorneys do to upper middle class whites. One of William Kunstler’s last research projects before passing away in 1995 was to tally up bonds bails and verdicts based on race. The statistics showed that bails and bonds were set much higher, and that the use of “flight risk” was used more frequently, for a black person than a white person.

Guilty verdicts and death sentences were given unevenly as well, and when rapes, murders, thefts, drug abuse, and more were charted as “black” and “non-black” rather than in some of the more traditional ways, the results supported Kunstler’s belief that Capital Punishment can never be fair in the U.S. until many daunting issues are overcome. Some of this research went into a larger body of work that led in 2003 to Illinois’ Republican Governor George Ryan’s granting blanket clemency to all 167 people on death row commuting their sentences to life without parole. Ryan had imposed a moratorium on the state’s death penalty in 2000 and asked for more research on the subject.

Bigger and Gus and the others planning out a robbery of Mr. Blum’s deli, although described in fiction, is a decent early account of day to day behavior of people in a street gang. Tookie Williams was accused of being a leader in the Crips street gang. There is only proof that he was affiliated with them. There is some evidence that he was a member. Insisting that he was a co-founder and a leader despite evidence to the contrary in a court of law seemed very similar in Wright’s book to the prosecution’s wheeling Bessie’s dead body into the courtroom on a gurney as evidence. The defense protests suggesting this evidence be excluded because it was meant solely to shock and outrage. These requests went unheard; once again showing the justice system as hostile toward the black and the poor.

Trying for an academic Marxian look at Bigger Thomas, you would see that he was looking for work. So issues of unemployment as well as poverty come up; and also that his mom raised him herself so he didn’t know his father well. No one in his family seems to be on an education track either. The struggle at the beginning of the book with his mom demanding that he kill a rat with an iron skillet shows that he was resisting and sometimes reluctantly buying into the idea of helping out as breadwinner in his family from the earliest times of adulthood.

Contrast Bigger’s life with that of Mary Dalton’s father, who owns the apartment complex where Bigger’s family rents. He occasionally hires Bigger, and donates millions of dollars to causes. He’s quite rich and clearly a willing recipient of what’s nowadays called “white privilege.”

Attorney Max is a recipient of white privilege as well, but he seems to try harder to use his position to be a helpful person in other ways additional to, say, donating large amounts of cash. At one point in the court case Max has a soliloquy of sorts where he warns everyone that there will be more and more Biggers if we don’t resolve many of our nation’s shortcomings regarding crime, punishment, racism, and the like.

Max pleads that with every “atom of my being, I beg this in order that not only may this black boy live, but that we ourselves may not die!” (Wright 473). He wasn’t pushing for a full “not guilty” verdict; but he was begging mercy that Bigger receive a life sentence rather than that of death. While a life sentence only seems a tiny bit more dignified than death it could potentially keep someone alive long enough for someone to come forward with new evidence that might show them as not guilty or only guilty of a lesser charge. Many states where there is Capital Punishment afford many appeals and additional process with just that in mind.

He’s ineffective at getting Bigger acquitted or simply given life; but very astute and eloquent in observing the justice system’s shortcomings. Nearly prophetic. Those issues still rage on today.

Tookie Williams’ attorneys were equally unsuccessful at getting the death penalty removed from his court case. Now Williams himself got a word in almost as profound as (and parallel to) that of attorney Max.

“Don’t join a gang,” he used to say in speeches and in one of his books which he wrote from his San Quentin cell. “You won’t find what you’re looking for. All you will find is trouble, pain and sadness. I know. I did.” Ironically, Williams received a letter from U.S. President George W. Bush while he was still alive and writing from a jail cell commending him for his social activism. Even that couldn’t sway Governor Schwarzenegger to stay his execution.

Here is part of a mass mailing the NAACP sent out in the eleventh hour trying so hard to sway the California Governor.

Urgent Note from The NAACP:

Dear Friends:

Last Friday, I met with Stan Tookie Williams, reformed gang leader, Nobel Peace prize nominee, and acclaimed author, who is scheduled to be executed in the state of California at 12:01AM on Tuesday, December 13, 2005.

I left our meeting with the certainty that Mr. Williams offers more in life than in death and have committed the full support of the NAACP in his fight for

clemency.

Having exhausted his appeals, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is the only person who can grant Mr. Williams clemency. At this critical time, I am asking for your help by signing our petition in support of Stan Tookie Williams. Every petition makes a difference and I promise each one will be delivered to Governor Schwarzenegger. (savetookie.org)

Requests to spare Williams went just as unheard as those on Bigger Thomas’ behalf. Although little has changed since Wright wrote Native Son, a brief look at Wright’s life and times might further illuminate these parallels.

Wright’s legendary rise from poverty, growing up in the early twentieth century on a Mississippi plantation to becoming a successful author, would not at first seem like it prepared him for this book, until one looks over his struggles along the way. He was shuttled from relative to relative during his earliest years so he lacked steady role models. Some of his time growing up was spent in an orphanage and some was with just his grandmother and aunt, which didn’t exactly afford him positive male role models either.

At nineteen, Wright migrated to Chicago, “along with masses of other blacks who fled the racism, poverty, and lynch law of the rural South only to find the cities of the urban North, as he put it, ‘sprawling centers of steel and stone’ as cold and unyielding as the South” (Gates 1399). He left Jim Crow and after settling in had to face feeling like John Doe; perhaps a nameless faceless person of said steel and stone.

Now look at some of Native Son’s dialogue where Bigger’s attorney asks him to look out the window.

“See all those buildings, Bigger?” Max asked, placing an arm about Bigger’s shoulders. He spoke hurriedly, as though trying to mold a substance which was warm and pliable, but which might soon cool.

“Yeah, I see ‘em…”

“You lived in one of them once, Bigger. They’re made out of steel and stone. But the steel and stone don’t hold ‘em together…” (Wright 498).

Wright is clearly speaking with a somewhat autobiographical tone in his observations both physical and metaphorical. He could’ve easily become a Bigger Thomas given different circumstances or times. He’s speaking of the infrastructure of American cities to be sure, but also about American peoples’ belief in the adversarial system of law. It works for many of us, to be sure, but not for Tookie Williams and not for Bigger Thomas.

Native Son earned Wright the reputation as a protest writer who “dared to expose the stresses and pathologies of the urban ghettos” (Gates 1400).

Throughout Native Son, Wright asks that the death penalty be replaced with life imprisonment; for Bigger Thomas, as well as for so many other people who will sit on or near “death row,” in fiction and in fact.

Had Tookie Williams’ case not originated in California, but Illinois (where Native Son took place, by the way) he might be alive today; but it wouldn’t have taken his defense attorney. It would have been commuted along with every other sentence in 2003 when Illinois Gov. George Ryan announced that he had commuted the sentences of all of the state’s death row inmates. “Our capital system is haunted,” said Ryan, “by the demon of error: error in determining guilt and error in determining who among the guilty deserves to die. What effect was race having? What effect was poverty having?”

Ryan himself did not see himself as anti-death penalty by any stretch. He was a Republican “acknowledged during his speech that his actions would not be universally applauded. But he said he felt he had no choice but to strike a blow in ‘what is shaping up to be one of the great civil rights struggles of our time.’” (Flock)

Capital punishment in Illinois came under the microscope after a group of journalism students at Northwestern began looking into the case of Anthony Porter in the late 1990s.

The students, working with their professor and a private investigator, found evidence that cleared Porter after 17 years on death row. Ryan vowed he would do whatever it took to “prevent another Anthony Porter.”

Ultimately, 13 inmates who had been sentenced to death were exonerated, and Ryan declared a moratorium on executions in the state. (Flock)

Should other Governors respond in kind? They should at least read Richard Wright’s Native Son, before killing one more person. They shouldn’t have killed Bigger Thomas and we should not have killed Tookie Williams.

Until “we the people” confront issues of race and class in the honest and transparent ways necessary, there will be more Tookie Williams’ and there are sure to be more Bigger Thomas’s.

The crux taken up in this great work of naturalism can be summed up as the “consciousness of Bigger Thomas, and millions of others more or less like him, white and black, according to the weight of the pressure we have put upon them, from the quicksands upon which the foundations of our civilization rest” (Wright 402).

Works Cited.

Flock, Jeff ‘Blanket commutation’ empties Illinois death row. 11 Jan 2003. Online. 16 Apr 2008.
<http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/01/11/illinois.death.row>.

Gates Jr., Henry L., ed. Norton Anthology of African American Literature. NY: W.W. Norton & Co., 2004.

Mitchell, Hayley R., ed. Readings on Native Son. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2000.

savetookie.org, Save Tookie. Online. 16 Apr 2008.
<http://www.savetookie.org>.

Williams, Stanley. Gangs and the Abuse of Power: Tookie Speaks Out Against Gang Violence. New York: PowerKids Press, 1997.

Wright, Richard. Native Son. New York: Harper Collins, 1940.

Yaffe, David. Fascinating Rhythm: Reading Jazz in American Writing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

06/17/2008

Newest Ultimate G33k t0y

Filed under: Food,Mundane Or Sublime,News,Sports,Tech — admin @ 9:07 am

The ultimate g33k t0y or what???

A portable wireless access point.

Yup. Give yourself a second device off of your own evdo:

and then share with two or three other peeps.

Nice.

We took it for a spin with this nokia and my Dell notebook

and it seems to give somewhere between DSL and high band

with hardly any inconsistency at all!

Awesome.

06/15/2008

War, Inc. Reviewing the reviewers.

Filed under: Academic,Humor,Music and Stuff,News,Sports — admin @ 10:08 am

War, Inc. Reviewing the reviewers.

Corporate media is not going to handle John and Joan Cusack’s
film, War, Inc., very well for a few reasons.

1) Don’t know how to review satire
2) What to make of a movie that makes fun of THEM
3) Pressure from corporate structure above for reviewers to pan such a movie.
4) Easier to attack something topical than support it.

So I’ll find links to some reviews out there the first couple weeks of this
movie’s run. First some things to keep in mind. If the review is from a town
that wasn’t on the sluggish distribution list, they probably wrote their review
having NOT seen it. (unless they watched a pirated copy) If you see some of
the following expressions high up in the review, “tries to do too many things,”
“tone deaf” “niggling factor,” “Fatuousness of this magnitude,” or “exhausting,”
there is a very good chance they were handed copy by the Pentagon or the State
department to rephrase, make it your own and add a byline.

Why would they leave some of those catch phrases in there? Oops. Journalists are
lazy by nature. You know that, I’m sure. I’m alert to that, I’ve been one myself
for a long time. And inside of the corporate media it’s the worst. Deadlines,
corporate pressure, task overload. Plagiarism, single-sourced stories, and
poorly written work is the norm these days.

But I digress. On to the reviews of the reviewers, here.

“Grosse Point Dumb,” says pajiba.com. “this one sucks ass through a straw,”
and “entirely too obvious to be decent political satire.” They’ve got nothing
to say after you strip away all the ad hominems, so I’ll stop there. I haven’t
read a lot of pajiba.com but it probably sucks ass through a garden hose.

“its lampoon of U.S. imperialism and military privatization,” says the Chicago
Reader, “is so bracingly obnoxious I didn’t really care,” and “In one scene,
embedded journalists file into a theater for a virtual-reality chopper mission.”

As I said, a lot of people just simply don’t get satire. And they look foolish too,
they’re not protecting themselves from lampoon, they’re so diligently protecting
their slavemasters. When Moliere used to absolutely slam Popes and Kings alike
there weren’t very many clergy or storekeepers saying, “Oh come on, this is
obnoxious,” or “sucks ass through a straw.” Instead they laughed and laughed
at whoever this “ass” must be. Some got it, and some didn’t but almost no one
attacked it save for the king or the popes themselves. Kings’ wives and popes’
bishops and nuns were laughing at their expense too. A King or a Pope might
never get it and go “Oh what an idiot, who would do that?” and then a wife or
an assistant would lean toward them and go “Um, I think this is about you.”

Yadda yadda yadda. Yup.

Chicago Reader buffoons themself too. I know you didn’t care. You didn’t plan
to care even before you watched the movie, I’m sure. And by the way, the virtual
reality is a metaphor for press pools, and embedded journalists, on a “what if.”
Take it to its worst extreme, that’s about what you see in the movie. One of the
times I laughed hardest throughout this movie was right after a woman removes her
goggles to yell at Cusack and Tomei for having their own real life drama, and then
goes back to her goggles and this Fauxnews War she’s watching on the big screen
is so realistic that she suddenly flips out simulating a sucking chest wound.
“I’ve been hit,” “Medivac me now!” Hahahahahahaha. Chicago Reader didn’t
get it.

Walpole Times gave it a B-. They seemed to like Hilary’s role but not the
others. How shallow. I won’t touch that. “…wishing they [Tomei and Duff]
were in a better movie, one that didn’t rely so much on slapstick and irony.”
Perhaps the Walpole Times writer should just go watch a porn or something.
Leave reviewing to people who know about characters, drama, comedy, climax,
etc. Slapstick and irony? I saw a lot of irony throughout, and a little bit
of slapstick, but it was chock full of all kinds of other humor as well.
Invective, sardonicism, wit, this thing’s full of wit. But you were staring
at the portrayal of someone far too young for you with all of her bellybutton
and half her pelvis exposed. You missed everything else, Walpole Times.

Seattle Times has this to say, “…on satiric overdrive from the moment Cusack
appears to the spaghetti-western-like musical score.”

Dammit, it’s about time someone mentions a situational convention or a literary
tool inside of something they’re calling a movie review. Yikes.

“Cusack seems to phone his performance in from a distant galaxy.”
— san fran cron

Wow, hate to inform you, cronpeople, you missed a LOT. Did you actually see this
film? It did play in your town, along with Chicago and NY, and nowhere else until
this weekend then it played in like 9 more places total. Yuck. Anyhew, I need to
point out to you that Cusack’s character was well developed, easy to identify
with, and potent. Only thing I could say critical about it, was it wasn’t
quite as powerful as his sister’s character. But that’s not saying much —
Joan’s role included several outbursts that were more powerful than anything
Jack Nicholson’s EVER done! I almost fell out of my seat a couple times
there. I felt like I was being verbally assaulted by a screenplay. Sinking
back in and realizing it was for a purpose — it felt quite cathartic.

Seattle Post Intelligencer says “Funny cast runs out of jokes halfway through.”

Wow. Sheepshit, the garbage truck, KROQ on my radio, LeBron James, the Iraqi
kid blowing up Cusack’s HMWVV saying, “next time bring candy!” and Ben Kingsley
accidentally striking his own Popeye’s with a missile; you didn’t get any of those?

Those were all second half jokes and the crescendo/climax worked, and so did
all the anti-climax. Beautifully done. A brilliant screenplay all through, I
thought. Also, the ballet music used during fight scenes was a nice touch.
Made me laugh so hard even talkers in the theater seemed frustrated with me.

“Cusack playing yet another soul-fried wiseacre running on emotional autopilot,”
says the Chicago Tribune. Um, you only need to look at Bush himself to see a
soul-fried automaton these days. But don’t stop there. Who else is Cusack’s
character a metaphor for? Wolf Blitzer, Lou Dobbs, far right and far left
people alike, The corporate media in general, or perhaps even the war itself.

Another metaphor I got that might not have even been thought through yet,
is that Cusack’s character seems to me like an Oliver North to Ben Kingsley’s
John Hull. Google them together, you’ll see what I mean. “john hull oliver
north” http://shrinkster.com/z91

Tribune did however, mention the following:

“Will the film look dated in 10 years? The more pertinent question is:
How dated will the real war look by then?”

Good call.

I guess I’ll close by biting the ear off of the Associated Press.

“often goes to hilariously absurd extremes.”

Isn’t that what satire is supposed to do???

“feels too dead-on and too soon since we’re still in the middle of the
very war that’s being satirized.”

Yes, I suppose it is bad form to dissent until after the war ends on its
own, right? It isn’t nice to call bullshit while the bullshit is piling up.
Best to wait for just the right moment.

{“Sir, I asked for this meeting to tell you with all respect sir, that
now that this battle is over, I didn’t feel very good about all these
things you made me do.”}

That would be fine for mopping and buffing an already clean floor, but not
for blowing up an orphanage, or torturing a Moslim person with captured sex
slaves. I’m sorry. It isn’t nice, but sometimes you just have to call bullshit.

John Cusack worked his ass off to find a way to call bullshit on this
misplaced Iraq war in a way that “we the people” might tolerate it, enjoy it,
laugh along the way, and perhaps consider dissenting our own selves our own way.

Our intolerance as a nation’s mainstream precedes us.

06/14/2008

Some Good Sound Podcasting Advice

Filed under: Tech — admin @ 5:45 pm

Equipment is the third most important factor in the ideal podcast.

Whether the podcast you’re about to make is commercial and monetizable,
hobbyist and fun — or even a little of both — there are two things
more important than equipment. You and your content, and not necessarily
in that order.

Content is the number one element by far. If you don’t have content,
you really don’t have a podcast. Content drives the podcast, keeps
it interesting and it really is the only reason someone will come
back for a second listen, or if you’re lucky, click on the RSS button
and subscribe for all the upcoming webcasts to go directly to their
device.

Whether you intend to entertain, inform, generate sales, find a buyer,
educate or some combination of the previous, your content should be
easy to acquire, orgainize and discuss. The rest is just the business
of formatting it into a fairly logical “story” that will hold the
listener to the end of your show.

As mentioned, you are the second most crucial part of the podcast.
You should be an expert in your field, already have access to people
who are, or at least you must have some skillset in interviewing,
and a very inquisitive personality. If you have none of that but
are formally trained in say, broadcast journalism or TV, sales or
print, there is a chance you’ll make a good podcast, but that
really is not likely and it’s definitely not automatic. There’s
a synergy between the voice and tone of a personality and the
topical nature of a good podcast that is not easily described
in words. As they say in many fields, “you either have it, or
you don’t.”

Take the Dawn and Drew Show, for example. Dawn Miceli and Drew
Domkus are a couple who just converse for an hour with a nice
microphone on RECORD and then save it to MP3 format for syndication.
Voila, one of the most popular podcasts ever, hobbyist OR commercial.

Others have come along and tried to emulate the same synergy of
two hosts, no guest, a microphone and recording tools, but have
found far less success. Is it Dawn? Is it Drew? Dawn and Drew
together? Is it the place they’re recording their show? Or the
time of day they pick to make it. All of that and more, to be
sure. You can’t describe it any better, but you go back and hit
the page, and become one of the literally millions listening
every time.

So a little bit about that third most important factor; the
equipment. You can do a decent podcast with only the most basic
gear, but it had better be even more compelling than most. For
a podcast with just amateur sound quality to do well over time,
the content and the personality must be consistent, exciting
and fresh. A listener, especially one listening with headphones
or earbuds will have a very low tolerance for abrupt dynamics
in volume, or background noise, or even changes in tone throughout
the presentation.

Some successful podcasts are done using just the condenser mic
on a laptop or the built-in mic to an iRiver and free open source
recording tools such as Audacity; while others have found success
with Audition, Protools, and Garageband; Audio Technica, Behringer
and Shure mics ranging from $79 to $1000. Many people these days
swear by a USB mic or an interface to connect your 1/8″ or 1/4″
mics, while others like to use a soundbooth in a recording studio
producing their content first; with post production at a console
and then their only interaction with computers being the uploading
of their content.

I’ll discuss technology more deeply another time, but with whatever
equipment you already have, or can acquire quite easily, your main
focus should be on getting the cleanest, hottest signal of each
sound or spoken word that you can. The rest can be done in post
production without too much trouble at all. If the signal is too
low; or it is so hot, noisy and clipping there isn’t a whole lot
you can do to make it sound better.

One can spend a lot of time, energy and research over the issue of
equipment and too much can never hurt unless it becomes chaotic and
counterintuitive. But you can’t possibly spend too much time preparing
the other two elements. Those of, content and personality.

Some other supporting roles that can help your podcast along.

1) The index.
2) The audience
3) The host

Briefly I will say that search engines, indexes and databases are
just made for podcasts. Transcripting your show is a good idea and
it helps a lot with discoverability. Every word you sing or speak
in a podcast can be transcribed to .pdf, .doc and .html and suddenly
it’s searchable in the engines. Someone will accidentally see you
as the first hit when searching for something only indirectly related
to your content. And more importantly, someone will find you when
looking for some of your main themes.

If your podcast gets successful over time, the audience themselves
will evolve into a culture all to their own. Have forums, perhaps
chats and guestbooks available that people can participate in. Again,
if someone replies with a reference to one of your particular shows,
they’re sure to put a link to the webpage where that edition sits.
And Voila, more discoverability. If an argument breaks out where
someone wants to point out something positive or negative, it will
elicit replies like, “Oh yeah? Where,” or “Show me the link,” and
again, out comes URL’s and you sit back and watch your product climb
in the search engines.

Hosting is very important. If you anticipate ever having to serve
lots and lots of hits, it is best to already be paying for hosting
that will give bandwidth that is nearly “unlimited.” If you use
the free sites, or your local ISP’s bandwidth that comes with
your monthly email accounts, brace yourself. I’ll mention a time
early in Adam Curry’s podcasting days when he was slashdotted for
the first time. (slashdotting is a new expression to describe the
phenomenon of your server shutting down for a long time because
there was too much unexpected volume all at once.) He was just
placing each podcast on a server that gave him some small amount
of bandwidth such as 2MB which can easily mean if you’re one of
many trying to download the MP3 at the same time, you won’t get
any content at all, just an error message. Days went on without
anyone being able to hear the daily show they’d come to love,
and bad feedback was pouring in. His next two podcasts spent much
time explaining that they were trying to work out bandwidth, and
he tried blogging it and explaining his troubles in forums where
he frequented. A nightmare in any broadcast field: explaining
why you can’t broadcast. This is perhaps the newest expression
to replace old-time radio’s concept of “dead air.” The word
“dead” was a triple entendre there. It literally meant there was
a painfully long time period void of signal, and it also served
as a career killer for the guilty party, while potentially killing
off a station’s “brand.”

A podcast is similar. You want people coming back. You want them
expecting your next show. And if you’re planning on monetizing
your podcast in any way, you want to be able to show that you
get many listeners that might consider the advertisers’ products
or services. If your potential advertiser or a venture capitalist
goes to your page and gets an hourglass, or an error message,
s/he WILL assume that many others are seeing the same.

So think about hosting ahead of time.

Hosting, audience, indexing, equipment, you and your content.
A magic six, of sorts.

Here’s hoping this essay got you some hits.

06/12/2008

Senator McCain Is Pro-Genocide

Filed under: Academic,Mundane Or Sublime,News — admin @ 6:34 am

First off let me say that John McCain is a war hero.

And his public statements AGAINST torture are to be respected and
admired just as much as his personal valor serving his country.

My love and ass kissing ends right there.

Senator John McCain is an outspoken advocate of genocide.

http://technorati.com/posts/XUL7iL08D6Cw07vHHRytRnH2bAv3Tehi%2Fi09A4Ujmv8%3D
http://www.acsa.net/cain2004.org/Dine-Navajo-PressRelease.htm
http://www.docudharma.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5621
http://www.blackmesais.org/McCain_bill0805.htm
http://www.aics.org/BM/bm.html

bfaUJPdQH7E

6v-M5ZPZXO0&hl=en

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress